Wednesday, 29 July 2009
Leading Witch (Tory, ret'd) Eddie Currie is prattling that Rantzen will have no policies, will just be saying "I'm ME!"
Rantzen will have some policies (or "Bright" ideas as she may well put it) but little sense or insight, let alone balance.
La Currie, who had a high profile affaire with a powerful man just as Rantzen did, has the judgement of Lizzie Dripping. Ask the chickens . . .
It is like Johnson B but more so, Rantzen is a shoe in like as not.
I wonder if Sean Woodward - with whom she used to work we are told - will find divided loyalties?
As predicted Ms Rantzen will be standing in Luton S despite the withdrawal of the labour MP Ms Moran from the lists which she claimed was her objective.
Rantzen is a dangerous menace, and funnily enough her Wiki entry has been polished extremely nicely! Doris Day is lined up for the biopic.
No reference any longer to the scandals involving employment of her children at Childline.
Should Lumley stand also we shall be in danger of a new politics - neo nazi vs waffly lib.
Worth considering what happened to the politics of the Philippines when their celebs were ensconced in power.
Friday, 24 July 2009
Today they will not take a post which points out the facts that a 0.9% (the BBC says it is 0.8%) reduction in GDP in the past 3 months is a lot better than the 2.8% fall in the preceding 3 months. I asked also what they thought a pre-moderated poster might call those whose bias was as per the article.
According to their rules pre-moderation is used when they fear that a poster may produce offensive material.
As they are offended by any criticism of themselves, any pro Government posts, and references to the truth that they pre-moderate my posts they obviously have very big problems.